INTERVIEW: Sam Klemke’s Time Machine or “What it means to exist today?”
I don’t know if you were aware that Existentialism isn’t a popular branch of philosophy (or of anything else) even in Europe, let alone the US? I don’t know why that is. I suppose that’s because the most influential representatives of this non-systemized philosophic approach like Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Heidegger (partly), Camus (partly) and Sartre, were all loners, „different“, almost ascetic (in a broad sense). It might be best to say that they all lived their philosophy. And because such life isn’t generally pleasant, it’s not generally accepted either. A lot has been gathered in Existentialism, and a lot has come of it, but it’s rarely accepted by someone to become a modern stoic (or strive to become one). In 1977, 17-year-old Sam Kemke begun his…